Increase in the axial resistance of concrete walls for buildings through the application of Carbon Fiber Polymers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This experimental work hopes to provide a potential solution by proposing techniques to improve the axial resistance capacity of reinforced concrete walls, using high-strength carbon filaments, and proposing a practical methodology for reinforcing existing reinforced concrete columns and walls. The methodology used to improve this work consists of the exploration and experimentation of two explicit parts, the first being a progression of material tests carried out in the laboratories of the Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, with the purpose of determining the direct mechanical properties. and not direct. The second part of the work included the analysis of the reinforced concrete walls through the non-linear concept modeled with the finite element method, verifying the non-linear attributes of the concrete by increasing the high-resistance carbon fiber. The results found have been obtained using the Cypecad software, and show that, in the case of carbon fiber reinforced specimens, a moment of 20.50 (tonf-m) is reached with respect to an axial load of 125.13 (tonf). On the other hand, the specimen without reinforcement reaches a moment of 18.20 (tonf-m) with respect to an axial load of 104.76 (tonf).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".