MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400235334 · doi:10.11159/iccste24.199

Properties of Geopolymer Concrete Made With Recycled Concrete Aggregates and Glass Fibers

2024· article· en· W4400235334 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mohammed Abughali, Tamer El‐Maaddawy, Hilal El-Hassan

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the International Conference on Civil, Structural and Transportation Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRecycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUnited Arab Emirates University
KeywordsGeopolymer cementGeopolymerMaterials scienceComposite materialGlass recyclingGlass fiberCompressive strength

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research aims to evaluate the workability and compressive strength of geopolymer concrete made with recycled concrete aggregates (RCA) and glass fibers (GF).The ambient-cured geopolymer concrete was prepared using a binder blend of slag and fly ash (3:1) and fine aggregates in the form of desert dune sand.Natural aggregates or RCA served as the coarse aggregates, while sodium silicate and sodium hydroxide formulated the alkaline activator solution.The investigated process parameters included the replacement percentage of natural aggregates with RCA, binder content, amount of additional water (added to the alkaline activator solution), particle size distribution of RCA, and volume fraction of GF.Experimental results indicated that replacing natural aggregates with 100% RCA had an insignificant impact on the workability but reduced the compressive strength by up to 25%.Increasing the binder content from 300 to 450 kg/m 3 in RCA geopolymer concrete reinforced with up to 2% GF, by volume, led to up to 28, 106, and 17% higher workability and 1-and 7-day compressive strengths, respectively.Adding up to 50 kg/m 3 of water increased the workability up to 230 mm while decreasing the compressive strength by up to 22%.Meanwhile, sieving the RCA to remove particles smaller and larger than 4.75 mm and 19 mm, respectively, increased the slump to 210 mm and 1-and 7-day compressive strength by 29 and 35%, correspondingly.The addition of 1 and 2% GF, by volume, decreased the workability by 2 and 9%, respectively, in comparison to the plain RCA geopolymer concrete mix, while the compressive strength was unaffected.Experimental findings highlight the possibility of utilizing RCA as a replacement for natural aggregates in slag-fly ash blended geopolymer concrete reinforced with glass fibers without compromising performance.Such beneficial use of RCA serves as a means of alleviating the adverse environmental impact associated with its disposal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the International Conference on Civil, Structural and Transportation EngineeringSame topicRecycled Aggregate Concrete PerformanceFrench-language works237,207