MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400235669 · doi:10.1667/rade-24-00017.1

Clustered DNA Damage and its Complexity: Tracking the History

2024· article· en· W4400235669 on OpenAlexaff
D.T. Goodhead, Michael Weinfeld

Bibliographic record

VenueRadiation Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA Repair Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDNAComputational biologyDNA damageBiologyGeneticsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The concept of radiation-induced clustered damage in DNA has grown over the past several decades to become a topic of considerable interest across the scientific disciplines involved in studies of the biological effects of ionizing radiation. This paper, prepared for the 70th anniversary issue of Radiation Research, traces historical development of the three main threads of physics, chemistry, and biochemical/cellular responses that led to the hypothesis and demonstration that a key component of the biological effectiveness of ionizing radiation is its characteristic of producing clustered DNA damage of varying complexities. The physics thread has roots that started as early as the 1920s, grew to identify critical nanometre-scale clusterings of ionizations relevant to biological effectiveness, and then, by the turn of the century, had produced an extensive array of quantitative predictions on the complexity of clustered DNA damage from different radiations. Monte Carlo track structure simulation techniques played a key role through these developments, and they are now incorporated into many recent and ongoing studies modelling the effects of radiation. The chemistry thread was seeded by water-radiolysis descriptions of events in water as radical-containing "spurs," demonstration of the important role of the hydroxyl radical in radiation-inactivation of cells and the difficulty of protection by radical scavengers. This led to the concept and description of locally multiply damaged sites (LMDS) for DNA double-strand breaks and other combinations of DNA base damage and strand breakage that could arise from a spur overlapping, or created in very close proximity to, the DNA. In these ways, both the physics and the chemistry threads, largely in parallel, put out the challenge to the experimental research community to verify these predictions of clustered DNA damage from ionizing radiations and to investigate their relevance to DNA repair and subsequent cellular effects. The third thread, biochemical and cell-based research, responded strongly to the challenge by demonstrating the existence and biological importance of clustered DNA damage. Investigations have included repair of a wide variety of defined constructs of clustered damage, evaluation of mutagenic consequences, identification of clustered base-damage within irradiated cells, and identification of co-localization of repair complexes indicative of complex clustered damage after high-LET irradiation, as well as extensive studies of the repair pathways involved in repair of simple double-strand breaks. There remains, however, a great deal more to be learned because of the diversity of clustered DNA damage and of the biological responses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.729
Threshold uncertainty score0.190

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.124
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRadiation ResearchSame topicDNA Repair MechanismsFrench-language works237,207