Electroosmotic Flow through a Porous Media within a Microchannel
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this work a non-Newtonian electroosmotic fluid flow through an embedded porous media within a microchannel is analysed.The fluid is assumed to follow the well-known simplified Phan-Thien-Tanner model (sPTT) under steady state and isothermal conditions.In this investigation, the embedded porous media acquires an electrical potential due to its interaction with the zeta potential at the microchannel's walls .Depending on that interaction, we define a zeta potential ratio = / which allow us to modulate the influence of an electrically charged porous media on the hydrodynamics and viscoelasticity of the fluid.Unlike similar investigations, in this work the boundary condition for the electric potential at the microchannel walls changes with the electrokinetic parameter = (2 2 2 / ) 1/2 [1].Here, represents the number of valences, represents the charge of an electron, describes the ionic distribution which follows the Boltzmann distribution [2, 3] and is the Boltzmann constant.Consequently, the boundary condition for the EDL potential at the microchannel walls ( = 1) can be written as a function of the zeta potentials and [4,5]:
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".