MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400237856 · doi:10.11159/cdsr24.115

Advanced Exercise Classification with a Hybrid CNN-GRU Model: Utilising IMU Data from Cell Phones

2024· article· en· W4400237856 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the International Conference of Control, Dynamic systems, and Robotics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicE-commerce and Technology Innovations
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInertial measurement unitComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We introduce a hybrid CNN-GRU model in this study to classify exercises using IMU time-series data, with a focus on jumping jacks, lunges, and squats.By combining Convolutional Neural Networks with Gated Recurrent Units, our model effectively manages the high dimensionality and variable sampling rates of IMU data.We employed data normalisation and augmentation techniques to refine the dataset.Our model showed high accuracy in classifying types of exercises, highlighting its potential in motion classification and fitness-tracking applications.These results emphasise the value of hybrid deep learning methods in analysing complex time-series data and make a significant contribution to the understanding of human exercise movement patterns.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.976
Threshold uncertainty score0.452

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it