MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A PRÁTICA PSICOLÓGICA DA DASEINSANALYSE POR BILÊ TATIT SAPIENZA

2022· article· pt· W4400242115 on OpenAlexaff
Gisleide da Costa Santos, Paulo Ernani Evangelista

Bibliographic record

VenuePsicologia em Revista · 2022
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychology and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyPsychologyHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Esta pesquisa visa sistematizar o entendimento da prática psicológica da Daseinsanalyse subjacente nas obras da psicóloga Bilê Tatit Sapienza, por meio de uma revisão bibliográfica. Após uma introdução ao tema, são sintetizados os processos psicoterapêuticos contemplados pela autora em seus livros. Em seguida, explicitamos a compreensão da terapia daseinsanalítica da autora, as competências exigidas para essa modalidade e a descrição da existência do paciente à luz da fundamentação filosófica que sustenta esta clínica. Concluímos que Sapienza, ao longo de sua obra, preocupa-se e preservar a seriedade da Daseinsanalyse, sendo sua proposta uma clínica voltada à aproximação genuína com cada paciente, favorecendo um vínculo que conduz às ressignificações, à mudança de olhar e ao surgimento de novas possibilidades da relação da existência com seu mundo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.095
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0800.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePsicologia em RevistaSame topicPsychology and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207