Bibliographic record
Abstract
This chapter outlines the test structure, administration and scoring guidelines, as well as the task demands of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). The validity and reliability of the MoCA is discussed, as well as the clinical applications and interpretations of the assessment. The MoCA is a neuropsychological assessment screener that is used to measure cognitive functioning and decline. The MoCA is recommended to be administered every three months or less and is normed for people ages 55-85 (Nasreddine, 2021). The full-length exam, MoCA Full (version 8.1), is scored on a 30-point basis and can be administered in 10 minutes. The MoCA Full assesses short-term memory, visuospatial/executive functioning, attention, concentration, working memory, language, and orientation to place and time (Nasreddine, 2021). The MoCA is useful in clinical settings to evaluate for and track cognitive decline amongst diverse populations, including Parkinson's disease, dementia, and vascular cognitive impairments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".