MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400248139 · doi:10.1063/5.0218097

Excess noise and thermoelectric effect in magnetron-sputtered VO2 thin films

2024· article· en· W4400248139 on OpenAlexafffund
Ozan Güneş, Onyebuchi I. Onumonu, A. Baset Gholizadeh, Chunzi Zhang, Q. Yang, Shi-Jie Wen, Richard J. Curry, Robert E. Johanson, Safa Kasap

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicTransition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaRoyal SocietySilicon Valley Community Foundation
KeywordsCondensed matter physicsMaterials scienceThermoelectric effectSeebeck coefficientThin filmSapphireCrystalliteAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ThermodynamicsPhysicsChemistryOpticsNanotechnologyMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work presents the excess noise and thermoelectric (Seebeck) measurements on polycrystalline vanadium dioxide (VO2) thin films. Noise spectral power density (SPD) of current fluctuations in the semiconducting (SC) phase had a typical flicker noise (f−γ) characteristic with an average slope parameter γ of 1.13. Normalized SPD (Sn) values obtained in the SC-phase indicate that the noise originates in the bulk of the film. On the contrary, in the metallic (M)-phase, γ values were greater than unity, and the observed Sn values indicated that the origin of the noise is most likely from the contacts or surface rather than the bulk. A general decrease was observed in Sn by a factor of 4–5 from the SC- to M-phase. Moreover, Sn in the SC-phase showed no temperature dependence. An interpretation based on the number of charge carrier fluctuations in Hooge's model led to an unrealistically high Hooge parameter and had to be ruled out. We propose that the fluctuations are related to the mobility fluctuations of carriers arising primarily from grain-boundary scattering which explains the observed characteristics well. The Seebeck coefficients (S) obtained under both heating and cooling schedules showed the n-type nature of magnetron-sputtered VO2 films in the SC-phase. Differently, in the M-phase, the S value was positive. The S values obtained from the cooling schedule signified the low percolation threshold of the metal-to-insulator transition already demonstrated for VO2 thin films grown on r-cut sapphire using the Efros–Shklovskii percolation model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.519

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicTransition Metal Oxide NanomaterialsFrench-language works237,207