Aprender desde lo alto: Cosmologías andinas y pedagogía radial en la experiencia de Pukllasunchis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El artículo presenta el proceso de análisis de tres actores de diferentes campos de especialidad, sobre el aprendizaje escolar en un programa de la Asociación Pukllasunchis, organización de la sociedad civil que trabaja en el campo de la educación intercultural en Perú. Los resultados del análisis muestran el papel clave que el medio radial puede jugar en una práctica pedagógica escolar que no sólo es sensible con la especificidad cultural de comunidades altoandinas, sino que también actúa desde esa base, fortaleciéndola. El análisis del programa se conjuga finalmente con aproximaciones teóricas al fundamento ontológico de lo que solemos llamar “cultura”, para señalar la necesidad de complementar la idea de “interculturalidad” con una noción de “internaturalidad” que permita enfocar el aprendizaje desde la forma de relación de los actores andinos con su entorno. Terminamos con planteamientos para pensar políticas que aborden el aprendizaje en la práctica.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".