MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400253059 · doi:10.4274/dir.2024.242828

Multidisciplinary approach to diagnostic radiology education: a novel educational intervention for Turkish medical students

2024· article· en· W4400253059 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Parth Patel, Emre Altınmakas, Görkem Ayas, Rachel Stanietzky, Madeline L. Stewart, Abdelrahman Elshikh, Disha Ram, Hrishika Bhosale, Mohamed Eltaher, Serageldin Kamel, Munevver Duran, Umut Yücel, Mohamed Badawy, Scott Rohren, Khaled M. Elsayes

Bibliographic record

VenueDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiology practices and education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTurkishLikert scaleMedical educationMultidisciplinary approachSession (web analytics)Medical diagnosisIntervention (counseling)Family medicineRadiologyNursingPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Teleconferencing can facilitate a multidisciplinary approach to teaching radiology to medical students.This study aimed to determine whether an online learning approach enables students to appreciate the interrelated roles of radiology and other specialties during the management of different medical cases.Turkish medical students attended five 60-90-minute online lectures delivered by radiologists and other specialists from the United States and Canada through Zoom meetings between November 2020 and January 2021.Student ambassadors from their respective Turkish medical schools recruited their classmates with guidance from the course director.Students took a pretest and posttest to assess the knowledge imparted from each session and a final course survey to assess their confidence in radiology and the value of the course.A paired t-test was used to assess pretest and posttest score differences.A 4-point Likert-type scale was used to assess confidence rating differences before and after attending the course sessions.A total of 1,458 Turkish medical students registered for the course.An average of 437 completed both pre-and posttests when accounting for all five sessions.Posttest scores were significantly higher than pretest scores for each session (P < 0.001).A total of 546 medical students completed the final course survey evaluation.Students' rating of their confidence in their radiology knowledge increased after taking the course (P < 0.001).Students who took our course gained an appreciation for the interrelated roles of different specialties in approaching medical diagnoses and interpreting radiological findings.These students also reported an increased confidence in radiology topics and rated the course highly relevant and insightful.Overall, our findings indicated that multidisciplinary online education can be feasibly implemented for medical students by video teleconferencing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.395
Teacher spread0.369 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiagnostic and Interventional RadiologySame topicRadiology practices and educationFrench-language works237,207