MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Messy Broadcasting in Grid

2024· preprint· en· W4400255087 on OpenAlexaff
Aria Adibi, Hovhannes A. Harutyunyan

Bibliographic record

VenuePreprints.org · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed and Parallel Computing Systems
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceDistributed computingScalabilityRobustness (evolution)GridBroadcasting (networking)Fault toleranceNode (physics)Focus (optics)Set (abstract data type)Computer networkTheoretical computer scienceDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In classical broadcast models, information is disseminated in synchronous rounds under the constant communication time model, wherein a node may only inform one of its neighbors in each time unit—also known as the processor-bound model. These models assume either a coordinating leader or that each node has a set of coordinated actions optimized for each originator, which may requiring nodes to have sufficient storage, processing power, and the ability to determine the originator. This assumption is not always ideal, and a broadcast model based on the node’s local knowledge can sometimes be more effective. Messy models address these issues by eliminating the need for a leader, knowledge of the starting time, and the identity of the originator, relying solely on local knowledge available to each node. This paper investigates the Messy broadcast time and optimal scheme in a Grid graph, a structure widely used in computer networking systems, particularly in parallel computing, due to its robustness, scalability, fault tolerance, and simplicity. The focus is on scenarios where the originator is located at one of the corner vertices, aiming to understand the efficiency and performance of Messy models in such Grid structures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Open science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.377
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.013
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.128
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePreprints.orgSame topicDistributed and Parallel Computing SystemsFrench-language works237,207