Editorial: Machine learning in radiation therapy for lung cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hooshangnejad et al present a study on the implementation of a novel, deeply accelerated adaptive RT (DAART) approach for lung cancer RT. Given that lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related deaths, and RT is a crucial treatment for medically inoperable early-stage NSCLC, the study of Hooshangnejad et al addresses a critical challenge in reducing the time from diagnosis to treatment initiation. The current median time of four weeks can lead to restaging and loss of local control, but the DAART approach, featuring the innovative deepPERFECT system, aims to significantly shorten this delay. Zhang et al conducted a comprehensive bibliometric analysis to investigate the progress, research trends, and hotspots in the application of ML to RT for NSCLC. As ML becomes increasingly integrated into NSCLC RT, understanding these trends is crucial for guiding future research and development. The study of Zhang et al provides valuable insights into the current state of ML applications in NSCLC RT and highlights potential hot areas for future research, thereby aiding researchers in identifying emerging trends and opportunities in this field. Moreover, Wang et al present a novel integrated solution for automatic intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) planning in NSCLC cases. This study aims to enhance the efficiency and consistency of treatment planning using advanced ML techniques. Wang et al demonstrates the feasibility and potential of this integrated solution to streamline the planning workflow and reduce variation in plan quality across different regions and treatment centers, paving the way for further improvements and broader clinical implementation. Guberina et al present a study aimed at assessing the interfraction stability of the delivered dose distribution in exhale-gated VMAT or IMAT for lung cancer. This study also seeks to identify dominant prognostic dosimetric and geometric factors influencing treatment effectiveness. The study of Guberina et al demonstrates that accumulated dose distributions over treatment series are robust against interfraction CTV deformations when using exhale gating and online image guidance. Dmin was identified as the most critical parameter for predicting gEUD in a single fraction. Other geometric parameters provided limited additional predictive value. These findings underscore the importance of dosimetric information, particularly the location and value of Dmin within the CTVi, for optimizing image-guided radiation treatment. In addition, Ye et al have developed an optimal ML model to predict the occurrence of radiation pneumonitis (RP) in lung cancer patients treated with VMAT. This study emphasizes the utility of lung equivalent uniform dose (lung EUD) as a predictive metric for RP, aiming to enhance predictive accuracy and treatment planning. The study of Ye et al utilized four prominent machine learning algorithms, demonstrating that lung EUD-based factors substantially enhanced predictive performance for RP 2+. The results advocate for the decision tree model with lung EUD-based predictors as the optimal tool for predicting RP in VMAT-treated lung cancer patients, potentially replacing conventional dosimetric parameters and simplifying complex neural network structures in prediction models.The collection of papers featured in this special issue presents a transformative shift in the lung cancer treatment. Each study addresses critical challenges within the field, from accelerating adaptive RT to predicting radiation pneumonitis occurrence. These advancements signify a significant step forward in optimizing treatment planning, enhancing precision, and improving patient outcomes. By harnessing the power of ML algorithms, researchers have developed innovative solutions that streamline treatment workflows, reduce planning uncertainties, and enable personalized care for patients with lung cancer. Furthermore, the integration of advanced dosimetric parameters and predictive models offers clinicians valuable insights into treatment response and toxicity prediction, ultimately guiding more informed decision-making processes.In contemplating the future direction of RT for lung cancer, the integration of ML is poised to play a pivotal role. As demonstrated by the studies featured in this special issue, ML algorithms hold immense potential in optimizing treatment planning, predicting treatment outcomes, and personalizing patient care. Looking ahead, further research in this domain is anticipated to focus on refining existing models, expanding datasets, and integrating multi-modal data sources to enhance predictive accuracy. Moreover, efforts towards the development of automated treatment planning systems and real-time adaptive strategies are expected to accelerate, aiming to streamline clinical workflows and mitigate uncertainties during treatment delivery. Furthermore, the integration of artificial intelligence and deep learning techniques offers promising avenues for novel insights into tumor biology, treatment response, and patient prognosis. Collaborative efforts between clinicians, physicists, and data scientists will be paramount in translating these technological advancements into tangible clinical benefits. Additionally, it is imperative to maintain a steadfast commitment to patient-centered care and ethical considerations, ensuring that these transformative technologies are harnessed responsibly to improve patient outcomes and quality of life.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.030 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.014 | 0.020 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".