Implementasi Standar K3 Di Ketinggian Sebagai Upaya Pencegahan Kecelakaan Kerja Di Proyek Pembangunan Gedung X (Studi Kasus Proyek Pembangunan Gedung X Kota Semarang)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstrak Proyek gedung sangat berkaitan dengan pekerjaan di ketinggian. Pekerjaan ketinggian pada pekerjaan struktur diketahui bahwa memiliki tingkat risiko yang tinggi. Berdasarkan data Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety tahun 2021, lebih dari 42.000 pekerja cedera setiap tahun karena jatuh. Sekitar 67% jatuh terjadi pada tingkat yang sama akibat terpeleset dan tersandung. 33% sisanya jatuh dari ketinggian. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui implementasi standar K3 di ketinggian sebagai upaya pencegahan kecelakaan kerja di Proyek Pembangunan Gedung X Kota Semarang. Jenis Penelitian ini adalah deskriptif kualitatif yang dilaksanakan pada bulan Februari 2022 sampai bulan Maret 2022. Hasil Penelitian ini diketahui bahwa dari 22 poin indikator, presentase indikator yang sesuai sejumlah 9,09% (2 indikator), tidak sesuai sejumlah 59,09% (13 indikator), dan tidak dilakukan sejumlah 31,81% (7 indikator). Simpulan dari penelitian ini yaitu implementasi standar K3 di ketinggian sebagai upaya pencegahan kecelakaan kerja di Proyek Pembangunan Gedung X Kota Semarang Belum Maksimal. Saran dari penelitian ini yaitu manajemen proyek Pembangunan Gedung X, melaksanakan indikator yang tidak sesuai dan tidak dilaksanakan. Abstract The building project is closely related to the work at height. Work at height on structural work is known to have a high level of risk. Based on 2021 Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety data, more than 42,000 workers are injured each year from falls. About 67% of falls occur at the same rate as a result of slipping and tripping. The remaining 33% fell from a height. The purpose of this study is to determine the implementation of the K3 standard at high altitudes to prevent work accidents in the Semarang City Building X Construction Project. This type of research is descriptive and qualitative and will be carried out from February 2022 to March 2022. The results of this study are known that from 22 indicator points, the percentage of corresponding indicators amounted to 9.09% (2 indicators), did not match the number of 59.09% (13 indicators), and did not do 31.81% (7 indicators). This study concludes that the implementation of the K3 standard at high altitudes as an effort to prevent work accidents in the Semarang City Building X Construction Project has not been maximized. The advice from this study is the project management of Building X Construction, implementing indicators that are not appropriate and not implemented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.055 | 0.027 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".