MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400267691 · doi:10.1016/s2542-5196(24)00114-1

Ambient air pollution and daily mortality in ten cities of India: a causal modelling study

2024· article· en· W4400267691 on OpenAlexaff
Jeroen de Bont, Bhargav Krishna, Massimo Stafoggia, Tirthankar Banerjee, Hem H. Dholakia, Amit Garg, Vijendra Ingole, Suganthi Jaganathan, Itai Kloog, Kevin Lane, R. K. Mall, Siddhartha Mandal, Amruta Nori‐Sarma, Dorairaj Prabhakaran, Ajit Rajiva, Abhiyant Tiwari, Yaguang Wei, Gregory A. Wellenius, Joel Schwartz, Poornima Prabhakaran, Petter Ljungman

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Planetary Health · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersVetenskapsrådetFondazione Internazionale MenariniBanaras Hindu UniversitySvenska Forskningsrådet FormasDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, IndiaFogarty International CenterSkogs- och Jordbrukets ForskningsrådWilliam and Flora Hewlett FoundationJohn D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
KeywordsAir pollutionPollutionEnvironmental healthGeographyEnvironmental scienceEffect modificationEnvironmental protectionMedicineEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background The evidence for acute effects of air pollution on mortality in India is scarce, despite the extreme concentrations of air pollution observed. This is the first multi-city study in India that examines the association between short-term exposure to PM 2·5 and daily mortality using causal methods that highlight the importance of locally generated air pollution. Methods We applied a time-series analysis to ten cities in India between 2008 and 2019. We assessed city-wide daily PM 2·5 concentrations using a novel hybrid nationwide spatiotemporal model and estimated city-specific effects of PM 2·5 using a generalised additive Poisson regression model. City-specific results were then meta-analysed. We applied an instrumental variable causal approach (including planetary boundary layer height, wind speed, and atmospheric pressure) to evaluate the causal effect of locally generated air pollution on mortality. We obtained an integrated exposure–response curve through a multivariate meta-regression of the city-specific exposure–response curve and calculated the fraction of deaths attributable to air pollution concentrations exceeding the current WHO 24 h ambient PM 2·5 guideline of 15 μg/m 3 . To explore the shape of the exposure–response curve at lower exposures, we further limited the analyses to days with concentrations lower than the current Indian standard (60 μg/m 3 ). Findings We observed that a 10 μg/m 3 increase in 2-day moving average of PM 2·5 was associated with 1·4% (95% CI 0·7–2·2) higher daily mortality. In our causal instrumental variable analyses representing the effect of locally generated air pollution, we observed a stronger association with daily mortality (3·6% [2·1–5·0]) than our overall estimate. Our integrated exposure–response curve suggested steeper slopes at lower levels of exposure and an attenuation of the slope at high exposure levels. We observed two times higher risk of death per 10 μg/m 3 increase when restricting our analyses to observations below the Indian air quality standard (2·7% [1·7–3·6]). Using the integrated exposure–response curve, we observed that 7·2% (4·2%–10·1%) of all daily deaths were attributed to PM 2·5 concentrations higher than the WHO guidelines. Interpretation Short-term PM 2·5 exposure was associated with a high risk of death in India, even at concentrations well below the current Indian PM 2·5 standard. These associations were stronger for locally generated air pollutants quantified through causal modelling methods than conventional time-series analysis, further supporting a plausible causal link. Funding Swedish Research Council for Sustainable Development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.091
Threshold uncertainty score0.969

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations66
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet Planetary HealthSame topicAir Quality and Health ImpactsFrench-language works237,207