MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400268266 · doi:10.1016/s2542-5196(24)00117-7

All-cause, cardiovascular, and respiratory mortality and wildfire-related ozone: a multicountry two-stage time series analysis

2024· article· en· W4400268266 on OpenAlexaff
Gongbo Chen, Yuming Guo, Xu Yue, Rongbin Xu, Wenhua Yu, Tingting Ye, Shilu Tong, Antonio Gasparrini, Michelle L Bell, Ben Armstrong, Joel Schwartz, Jouni J K Jaakkola, Eric Lavigne, Paulo Hilario Nascimento Saldiva, Haidong Kan, Dominic Royé, Aleš Urban, Ana Maria Vicedo-Cabrera, Aurelio Tobı́as, Bertil Forsberg, Francesco Sera, Yadong Lei, Michael J Abramson, Shanshan Li, Rosana Abrutzky, Barrak Alahmad, Caroline Ameling, Christofer Åström, Susanne Breitner, Gabriel Carrasco‐Escobar, Micheline de Sousa Zanotti Stagliorio Coêlho, Valentina Colistro, Patricia Matus Correa, Trần Ngọc Đăng, Francesca de’Donato, Do Van Dung, Alireza Entezari, Samuel David Osorio García, Rebecca M. Garland, Patrick Goodman, Yue Leon Guo, Masahiro Hashizume, Iulian‐Horia Holobâcă, Yasushi Honda, Danny Houthuijs, Magali Hurtado‐Díaz, Carmen Íñiguez, Klea Katsouyanni, Ho Kim, Jan Kyselý, Whanhee Lee, Marek Maasikmets, Joana Madureira, Fatemeh Mayvaneh, Baltazar Nunes, Hans Orru, Nicol ́s Valdés Ortega, Ala Overcenco, Shih‐Chun Pan, Mathilde Pascal, Martina S. Ragettli, Shilpa Rao, Niilo Ryti, Evangelia Samoli, Alexandra Schneider, Noah Scovronick, Xerxes Seposo, Massimo Stafoggia, César De la Cruz Valencia, Antonella Zanobetti, Ariana Zeka

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Planetary Health · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate Change and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaHealth Canada
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónNational Health and Medical Research CouncilMedical Research CouncilMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónMinistry of Science and Technology, TaiwanUniversità degli Studi di FirenzeSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungScience and Technology Commission of Shanghai MunicipalityGrantová Agentura České RepublikyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceEquatorTrend analysisLagAir pollutionDistributed lagOzoneDemographyGeographyLatitudeClimatologyMeteorologyEcologyBiologyStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Wildfire activity is an important source of tropospheric ozone (O 3 ) pollution. However, no study to date has systematically examined the associations of wildfire-related O 3 exposure with mortality globally. Methods We did a multicountry two-stage time series analysis. From the Multi-City Multi-Country (MCC) Collaborative Research Network, data on daily all-cause, cardiovascular, and respiratory deaths were obtained from 749 locations in 43 countries or areas, representing overlapping periods from Jan 1, 2000, to Dec 31, 2016. We estimated the daily concentration of wildfire-related O 3 in study locations using a chemical transport model, and then calibrated and downscaled O 3 estimates to a resolution of 0·25° × 0·25° (approximately 28 km 2 at the equator). Using a random-effects meta-analysis, we examined the associations of short-term wildfire-related O 3 exposure (lag period of 0–2 days) with daily mortality, first at the location level and then pooled at the country, regional, and global levels. Annual excess mortality fraction in each location attributable to wildfire-related O 3 was calculated with pooled effect estimates and used to obtain excess mortality fractions at country, regional, and global levels. Findings Between 2000 and 2016, the highest maximum daily wildfire-related O 3 concentrations (≥30 μg/m 3 ) were observed in locations in South America, central America, and southeastern Asia, and the country of South Africa. Across all locations, an increase of 1 μg/m 3 in the mean daily concentration of wildfire-related O 3 during lag 0–2 days was associated with increases of 0·55% (95% CI 0·29 to 0·80) in daily all-cause mortality, 0·44% (–0·10 to 0·99) in daily cardiovascular mortality, and 0·82% (0·18 to 1·47) in daily respiratory mortality. The associations of daily mortality rates with wildfire-related O 3 exposure showed substantial geographical heterogeneity at the country and regional levels. Across all locations, estimated annual excess mortality fractions of 0·58% (95% CI 0·31 to 0·85; 31 606 deaths [95% CI 17 038 to 46 027]) for all-cause mortality, 0·41% (–0·10 to 0·91; 5249 [–1244 to 11 620]) for cardiovascular mortality, and 0·86% (0·18 to 1·51; 4657 [999 to 8206]) for respiratory mortality were attributable to short-term exposure to wildfire-related O 3 . Interpretation In this study, we observed an increase in all-cause and respiratory mortality associated with short-term wildfire-related O 3 exposure. Effective risk and smoke management strategies should be implemented to protect the public from the impacts of wildfires. Funding Australian Research Council and the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet Planetary HealthSame topicClimate Change and Health ImpactsFrench-language works237,207