Three-dimensional path planning and collision-free flight control for drone-assisted autonomous pollination systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, the authors’ previous work regarding a conceptual drone-assisted autonomous pollination system (APS) is extended with regards to path planning and flight control. The APS Path Planning module is extended to optimize the path for missions requiring three-dimensional (3D) path planning, such as the pollination of almond trees. A new method of simplifying the 3D path planning problem by selecting cells or groups of flowers to visit is shown in this paper. This method is numerically demonstrated based on a simulated almond tree. The Flight Control module is extended to incorporate drag into a novel convex-optimization-based flight controller and a new method of collision avoidance called control sequence stitching (CSS). A linear drag model is integrated into the flight control formulation, which is validated through a simulated test flight. The concept of CSS is developed and explained as a method to generate seamless flight trajectories, while still reaping the benefits of convex optimization. This method can be used to generate collision-free trajectories and control commands rapidly for potential real-world APS missions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it