MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400272923 · doi:10.21105/joss.05839

HeuDiConv — flexible DICOM conversion into structureddirectory layouts

2024· article· en· W4400272923 on OpenAlexaff
Yaroslav O. Halchenko, Mathias Goncalves, Satrajit Ghosh, Pablo Velasco, Matteo Visconti di Oleggio Castello, Taylor Salo, John T Wodder, Michael Hanke, Patrick Sadil, Krzysztof J. Gorgolewski, Horea-Ioan Ioanas, Chris Rorden, Timothy Hendrickson, Michael Dayan, Sean Dae Houlihan, James D. Kent, Ted Strauss, John Anthony Lee, Isaac To, Christopher J. Markiewicz, Darren Lukas, Ellyn R. Butler, Todd W. Thompson, Maite Termenón, David V. Smith, Austin Macdonald, David N. Kennedy

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Open Source Software · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMcGill Genome Centre
FundersNational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and BioengineeringNational Institute of Mental HealthNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsDICOMComputer scienceWorkflowPython (programming language)Computer graphics (images)Artificial intelligenceComputer architectureDatabaseProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

🚀 Enhancement BF: support _ses-DATE as alternative to _ses-{date} for Siemens XA60 #848 (@yarikoptic) Allow for relative, up to 5% differences, while comparing numerics for fieldmap correspondence #842 (@yarikoptic) 🐛 Bug Fix Fix fmap rec dir ordering #855 (@octomike) 🏠 Internal gh-actions: Bump codecov/codecov-action from 5 to 6 #854 (@dependabot[bot]) gh-actions: Bump actions/checkout from 5 to 6 #841 (@dependabot[bot]) Authors: 3 @dependabot[bot] Michael (@octomike) Yaroslav Halchenko (@yarikoptic)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: Software
Teacher disagreement score0.280
Threshold uncertainty score0.938

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2800.083

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Open Source SoftwareSame topicMedical Imaging Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207