MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Text-Guided Real-World-to-3D Generative Models with Real-Time Rendering on Mobile Devices

2024· article· en· W4400276244 on OpenAlexaff
Vu Tuan Truong, Long Bao Le

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHuman Motion and Animation
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceRendering (computer graphics)Computer graphics (images)Real-time renderingGenerative grammarMobile deviceComputer visionArtificial intelligenceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent generative diffusion models are attracting enormous attention with various breakthroughs in text-to-image, text-guided image-to-image, and text-to-3D generation. In this paper, we propose MobileGen3D, a bridge between text-driven real-world-to-3D generation and real-time on-device rendering. Given several real-world images of a person/object and a text prompt, MobileGen3D can provide a 3D model of the given content which has been customized according to the text prompt and can be rendered on mobile devices in real-time. No additional 3D training data is required in our method. Based on neural light fields (NeLF), MobileGen3D speeds up the inference process dramatically compared to other 3D synthesis methods that rely on neural radiance fields (NeRF). As a result, we demonstrate that our method can generate high-resolution 3D contents with realistic edits and low disk storage requirement of just 6.48 MB. These 3D contents can be rendered directly by mobile devices and augmented/virtual reality devices with a high rendering speed of 61.2 FPS on our experimented iPhone 14. Our implementation is available with detailed guidelines at this page: https://github.com/tuanvu171/MobileGen3D

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.724
Threshold uncertainty score0.964

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHuman Motion and AnimationFrench-language works237,207