MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400276545 · doi:10.1109/tmech.2024.3408810

Optimal Motion Planning Under Dynamic Risk Region for Safe Human–Robot Cooperation

2024· article· en· W4400276545 on OpenAlexaff
Man Li, Jiahu Qin, Ziming Wang, Qingchen Liu, Yang Shi, Yaonan Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobot Manipulation and Learning
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Anhui ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceMotion (physics)Motion planningRobotRisk analysis (engineering)BusinessArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As the development of factory automation, the workers and the robots are inevitable to collaborate in close proximity in a shared workspace, which makes the assurance of human safety a top priority. This article proposes a novel optimal motion planning framework for the manipulator to realize safe human–robot cooperation. To deal with the difficulties induced by the uncertainty and the sudden change of human movement, we design a novel dynamic risk region whose size is adjusted according to the predicted human velocity. Considering that the direct prediction of human velocity with low uncertainty is difficult due to the sensor noises and the errors involved with differential calculus, we first predict the human position at the next time step via Gaussian process regression, and then use it to predict the human velocity with the consideration of position prediction confidence. Then, we design the task controller by optimizing the performance index over an infinite time horizon, and design the safety-critical controller by extending the existing control barrier function-based method. Different from the existing works, we introduce a repulsive part to push the robot out when it enters the risk region, and provide an effective control gain design way to improve the adaptability in the dynamic environment. Finally, the simulation and experimental studies show that compared with the approaches with the fixed risk region and the simple proportional controller, our framework can get better trajectory tracking and safety performance in the dynamic environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.971
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE/ASME Transactions on MechatronicsSame topicRobot Manipulation and LearningFrench-language works237,207