MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Temporal Partitioned Federated Learning for IoT Intrusion Detection Systems

2024· article· en· W4400277025 on OpenAlexaff
Mohannad Abu Issa, Mohamed Ibnkahla, Ashraf Matrawy, Abdelrahman Eldosouky

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Security and Intrusion Detection
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceIntrusion detection systemInternet of ThingsFederated learningArtificial intelligenceComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Machine learning-based intrusion detection systems (IDSs) serve as a defense-in-depth layer for Internet of Things (IoT) networks by detecting potential intrusions within IoT traffic. However, resource-constrained IoT devices impose sig-nificant challenges in developing effective IDSs. Recently, fed-erated learning (FL) has emerged as a promising solution for training detection models on distributed IoT devices without compromising resource limitations resulting in the introduction of FL-based IDSs. To this end, this paper introduces a novel approach to enhance the effectiveness of current FL-based IoT IDSs while utilizing the same resources. The proposed system partitions the FL rounds between IoT device groups, allowing each group to update the FL detection model during its time partition. Hence, by implementing this temporal partitioning, multiple detection models are updated within one FL round using the same IoT resources. The main design goals of the proposed approach are to improve detection accuracy and convergence time compared to the traditional approach. For this purpose, the proposed approach is evaluated and compared to the traditional approach using five intrusion scenarios on IoT traffic obtained from the Edge-IIoTset dataset. The results demonstrate that the proposed temporal partitioned FL-based IoT IDS outperforms the traditional system by achieving higher detection accuracy and faster convergence time. Furthermore, the proposed approach achieves the required detection accuracy in fewer FL rounds, which can, in principle, save more IoT resources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNetwork Security and Intrusion DetectionFrench-language works237,207