Cross-Domain Multicarrier Waveform Design for Integrated Sensing and Communication
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) is expected to be a promising technology in the sixth-generation (6G) wireless networks for its ability to alleviate resources shortage and excessive hardware expenses. One typical representative for ISAC waveforms is the orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) waveform, which divides the time-frequency resources into orthogonal resource elements (REs). In order to satisfy their diverse design requirements and mitigate mutual interference, the communication and sensing subsystems can be assigned with different REs, which necessitates effective allocation strategies of different resources across time and frequency domains. In this article, a cross-domain multicarrier waveform design method-ology is proposed, which optimizes the RE assignment and power allocation strategies for the OFDM-based ISAC system. Specifically, for sensing performance enhancement, the unit cells of the ambiguity function (AF) of the sensing components are spe-cially shaped to achieve a “locally” perfect auto-correlation (AC) property within a predefined region of interest (RoI) in the Delay-Doppler domain. Afterwards, the irrelevant cells outside the RoI, which can determine the sensing power allocation strategy, are optimized alternatively with the communication power allocation strategy to maximize the throughput for the communication purpose. Numerical results demonstrate the superiority of the cross-domain multicarrier waveform design, which also provides useful guidelines for parameter settings of the proposed OFDM-based ISAC system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".