MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Power Loss Reduction Using Distributed Generation Sources Considering Protection Coordination and Harmonic Limits

2024· article· en· W4400277478 on OpenAlex
Ali Akbarzadeh Niaki, Reza Parsibenehkohal, Mohsin Jamil

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIslanding Detection in Power Systems
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReduction (mathematics)Computer scienceHarmonic analysisPower (physics)Distributed generationElectric power systemElectronic engineeringEngineeringPhysicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nowadays, high penetration of distributed generation (DG) sources in the distribution system has several impacts such as harmonic distortion, changes in short circuit current levels and power flow through branches. Using DG has both advantages and disadvantages. For example, supplying the loads locally would reduce network losses, while the overcurrent relays coordination might fail. In this paper, a new optimization problem is introduced to minimize distribution system losses by adding DGs as well as maintain the original protection scheme considering harmonic distortion limits. The problem is solved using Genetic Algorithm (GA) to find the optimal sizes of DGs to achieve the minimum losses in compliance with the desired constraints. Simulation studies are performed on 14-node radial distribution test system to validate the performance of the purposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.774
Threshold uncertainty score0.543

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIslanding Detection in Power SystemsFrench-language works237,207