MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

MetaCrowd: Blockchain-Empowered Metaverse via Decentralized Machine Learning Crowdsourcing

2024· article· en· W4400277831 on OpenAlexaff
H Le, Vu Tuan Truong, Duc N. M. Hoang, Thai Vu Nguyen, Long Bao Le

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlockchain Technology Applications and Security
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrowdsourcingBlockchainComputer scienceMetaverseHuman–computer interactionWorld Wide WebComputer securityVirtual reality

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Metaverse allows a 3D virtual mapping of the physical world to the digital world in which users interact with each other via digital avatars with a wide range of virtual activities. To realize this, the metaverse will inevitably employ numerous machine learning (ML) systems to enable the virtual-physical mapping process and offer intelligent virtual services to metaverse users (MUs). However, metaverse service providers (MSPs), who need ML models for their services (e.g., virtual events and healthcare services), may not have the expertise or resources required to build these underlying ML models. In addition, although ML models can be offered by a crowd of experienced ML workers (MLWs), the MLWs might not be able to collect the desired data for training their ML models due to privacy issues and the large-scale, distributed nature of the metaverse. In this paper, we propose MetaCrowd, a blockchain-based ML crowdsourcing framework that aims to overcome the mentioned issues and make ML accessible to a wide range of MUs and MSPs. Unlike traditional crowdsourcing systems which rely on central authorities, MetaCrowd is decentralized and automatic thanks to blockchain and smart contracts, thereby mitigating the single point of failure and trust issues. Experimental results illustrate the efficiency of MetaCrowd in both performance and cost. In addition, a decentralized application is also implemented and published widely to show its feasibility in practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.915
Threshold uncertainty score0.792

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBlockchain Technology Applications and SecurityFrench-language works237,207