MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Hemispherical Massive MIMO Architecture for High-Altitude Platform Station (HAPS)

2024· article· en· W4400277832 on OpenAlexaff
Omid Abbasi, Halim Yanıkömeroğlu, Georges Kaddoum

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSatellite Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie SupérieureCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArchitectureComputer scienceMIMOEffects of high altitude on humansEnvironmental scienceTelecommunicationsComputer networkMeteorologyGeographyChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we present a novel hemispherical antenna array (HAA) designed for High-Altitude Platform Stations (HAPS). Traditional rectangular antenna arrays for HAPS suffer from a significant limitation - their antenna elements are perpetually oriented downward, resulting in low gain for distant users. Meanwhile, cylindrical antenna arrays were introduced to mitigate this drawback, but they, in turn, exhibit a distinct problem: their antenna elements continually face the horizon, leading to suboptimal gain for users located beneath the HAPS. To address these challenges, we introduce the HAA. In the HAA configuration, antenna elements are strategically distributed across the surface of a hemisphere, ensuring that each user receives direct alignment with specific antenna elements, thereby maximizing the gain for all users. We derive the achievable data rates for users within this proposed scheme, employing an analog beamforming technique that leverages the steering vectors of the selected antenna elements for each user. We also formulate an op-timization problem focused on maximizing the minimum Signal-to-Interference-plus-Noise Ratio (SINR) for users. Additionally, we introduce an antenna selection algorithm based on the gains of the antenna elements. To further enhance system performance, we employ the Bisection method to determine the optimal power allocation for each user. Our simulation results substantiate the superior rate performance of the proposed HAA when compared to the conventional rectangular and cylindrical baseline arrays. The proposed approach demonstrates to reach sum data rates of up to 14 Gigabit/s. Furthermore, in contrast to the baseline schemes, the proposed scheme achieves more consistent spectral efficiencies across the entire coverage area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.943
Threshold uncertainty score0.416

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSatellite Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207