MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400281068 · doi:10.1093/qjmed/hcae070.285

Frailty in Hemodialysis Patient

2024· article· en· W4400281068 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Khaled Hussein Abou Seif, Magdy Mohamed Saied El Sharkawy, Mohamed Saeed Hassan, Ahmed Amgad Hosny Elsayed Atta

Bibliographic record

VenueQJM · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDialysis and Renal Disease Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHemodialysisMedicineIntensive care medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Frailty has been defined as a state of increased vulnerability to stressors as a consequence of degeneration in multiple systems. There remain two schools of thought with regard to frailty: one which sees frailty as a physical phenotype characterized by sarcopenia and another that views frailty as an accumulation of deficits across a variety of domains. Aim of the Work The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of frailty among dialysis population. Patients and Methods This cross section study carried out in Hemodialysis Unit of the Nasr City Health Insurance Hospital between October 2020 and July 2021. The total number of the study was 325 hemodialysis patients, 25 were excluded from the study, thus the enrolled final number became 300 hemodialysis patients on maintenance hemodialysis therapy for at least 6 months. Results The mean age of the patients was 45.57±11.79 years (range 25-65 years) 50% of them were under 45 years of age. 258 (86%) of patients were males and 42 (14%) females, with male to female ratio about 6.14:1. 37 patients (12.3%) has positive HCV, while the results also show that none of the HBV and HIV of the study group. 10 patients (3.3%) of vulnerable, 89 (29.7%) patients at mild frailty, table also clarified that, 126 (42.0%) patients at moderat4e frailty, furthermore, 75 (25%) patients at severe frailty in Edmonton frail scale. There was significant positive association between frailty and age with p-value <0.001. Males more affected by frailty than females. Conclusion The differences in the frailty prevalence among CKD patients could be caused by the different definitions of frailty that each study adopted. It is important to prevent early-onset disability in end-stage renal disease, which may be accelerated by frailty in this patient population, which includes individuals who already carry a high risk of morbidity and mortality. We adopted the Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS) based on self-report, it is very simple to administer and can be carried out by hemodialysis nursing staff after minimal training, without the need for specialist medical staff, in less than 15 min. Its association with poor short-term outcome highlights its utility in detecting frail patients, but because it is a multi-domain test, it also gives health professionals information about which areas of frailty are affected. This would allow specialists to administer specific, more complex scales to detect deficits in independence for basic and instrumental activities of daily life, cognition, emotional status, and social support. Our findings allow us to recommend the inclusion of the frailty comprehensive assessment of patients starting the dialysis program to timely identification of frailty syndrome.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.899
Threshold uncertainty score0.657

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQJMSame topicDialysis and Renal Disease ManagementFrench-language works237,207