MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Foreign Experience in Digitalization of Preventive Public Financial Control (on the Example of USA, China, Canada, India and Australia)

2024· article· en· W4400283448 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Olga Dolganova, D.A. Kozyrev

Bibliographic record

VenueГосударственное управление Электронный вестник · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEconomic and Technological Developments in Russia
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinaControl (management)BusinessFinanceEconomic growthPolitical scienceEconomicsManagement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article discusses the issues of implementing preventive financial control using modern digital technologies. The up-to-date level of informatization of the government agencies activity and local governments allows moving to a qualitatively new level of interaction between regulatory authorities and the environment under control. In this case the verification and analysis of reporting is performed not only after the fact of fulfillment but also in a preventative manner. This allows a quick respond to emerging risk situations, prevention of erroneous actions, and management decisions in a real time. When solving the problem of digitalization of state financial control procedures, the emphasis and priorities can be placed differently, both in the selection of automated processes and in the selection of technological solutions. The experience of other countries represents a valuable source of knowledge in this area. Therefore, the aim of the article is to study the best practices in digitalization of state financial control and to develop the recommendations for implementing preventive digital state financial control in Russia. This article presents the analysis of the experience of the USA, China, Canada, India, and Australia. The main projects are considered that were implemented in these countries to improve the financial control by implementing digital solutions. The features and areas of application of cloud computing, technologies of data collection, processing and analyzing the Big Data, as well as systems based on artificial intelligence in the field of public financial control are presented. As a result, recommendations have been formulated for adapting the best practices of these countries for the implementation of preventive digital control in the financial and budgetary sphere in our country. A further elaborated investigation of organization of the collection and processing of data on the object under control, coming not only from its corporate sources and government information systems but also from publicly available Internet resources, is considered as a relevant issue.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.785
Threshold uncertainty score0.778

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueГосударственное управление Электронный вестникSame topicEconomic and Technological Developments in RussiaFrench-language works237,207