MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Discovery and Characterization of a Chemical Probe for Cyclin-Dependent Kinase-Like 2

2024· article· en· W4400283576 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Frances M. Bashore, Sophia M. Min, Xiangrong Chen, Stefanie Howell, Caroline H. Rinderle, Gabriel Morel, Josie A. Silvaroli, Carrow I. Wells, Bruce A. Bunnell, David H. Drewry, Navjotsingh Pabla, Sila K. Ultanir, Alex N. Bullock, Alison D. Axtman

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesGenentechOntario Genomics InstituteEuropean Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and AssociationsMerck KGaANational Institutes of HealthOntario GenomicsFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloFrancis Crick InstituteGenome CanadaMcGill UniversityWellcome TrustNorth Carolina Biotechnology CenterMedical Research CouncilBayerCancer Research UKLouLou FoundationPfizer
KeywordsCharacterization (materials science)Computer scienceKinaseComputational biologyChemistryNanotechnologyMaterials scienceBiochemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Acylaminoindazole-based inhibitors of CDKL2 were identified via analyses of cell-free binding and selectivity data. Compound 9 was selected as a CDKL2 chemical probe based on its potent inhibition of CDKL2 enzymatic activity, engagement of CDKL2 in cells, and excellent kinome-wide selectivity, especially when used in cells. Compound 16 was designed as a negative control to be used alongside compound 9 in experiments to interrogate CDKL2-mediated biology. A solved cocrystal structure of compound 9 bound to CDKL2 highlighted key interactions it makes within its ATP-binding site. Inhibition of downstream phosphorylation of EB2, a CDKL2 substrate, in rat primary neurons provided evidence that engagement of CDKL2 by compound 9 in cells resulted in inhibition of its activity. When used at relevant concentrations, compound 9 does not impact the viability of rat primary neurons or certain breast cancer cells nor elicit consistent changes in the expression of proteins involved in epithelial–mesenchymal transition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.545

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Medicinal Chemistry LettersSame topicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamicsFrench-language works237,207