Detecting element migration from ore systems: an LA-ICP-MS method for the <i>in situ</i> measurement of element contents and <sup>207</sup> Pb/ <sup>206</sup> Pb values on rough fracture coatings
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In situ elemental content and 207 Pb/ 206 Pb values in three rough fracture coatings within drill cores from the McArthur River unconformity-related uranium deposit, Athabasca Basin, Canada, were measured using laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) image mapping. Fracture-coating samples were located proximal and distal to the ore deposit. Samples required minimal preparation in this method, with areas ( c . 500 × 500 <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mi>μ</mml:mi> </mml:math> m) targeted in a cell-spaced grid pattern using a 50 <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mi>μ</mml:mi> </mml:math> m spot, spaced 200 <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mi>μ</mml:mi> </mml:math> m on the x -axis with an offset of 100 <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mi>μ</mml:mi> </mml:math> m on the y -axis, to overcome sample surface topography. A 5 s acquisition time was applied to elemental content measurements and a 2 s acquisition time was applied to 207 Pb/ 206 Pb measurements. These parameters increased the spatial resolution and analytical sensitivity and minimized the contribution of the host rock underlying the fracture surface to the geochemical signal in comparison to extended acquisition times. In addition, laser ablation temporal profiles allow for the interpretation of the timing of element/isotope migration and fixation on the rough fracture coating. Rasterized maps generated in Iolite™ v.4 demonstrate the chemical distribution of elements and 207 Pb/ 206 Pb values on the rough fracture coatings, allowing for the identification of mineral phases hosting pathfinder elements, pathfinder element associations and the generation of bulk in situ or specific mineralogy geochemical values. Bulk in situ values calculated using an integration of the 2D image data and targeting the c . 500 × 500 <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mi>μ</mml:mi> </mml:math> m surface of the fracture coating compared to previous bulk geochemical methods obtained by sampling the fracture coating with a microdrill (i.e. modified aqua regia (HCl: HNO 3 : H 2 O) and weak acid leach (2% HNO 3 )) highlights that in situ analysis greatly improved detection of pathfinder elements on the fracture surface. This study is the first application of in situ LA-ICP-MS for measuring element contents and 207 Pb/ 206 Pb values on rough fracture coatings and demonstrates its importance as a new geochemical tool to the mining industry for future mineral exploration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".