MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400285377 · doi:10.1002/mp.17286

Correction: “Generation and comparison of 3D dosimetric reference datasets for COMS eye plaque brachytherapy using model‐based dose calculations” https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.16721

2024· erratum· en· W4400285377 on OpenAlexaff
Elizabeth M. Fletcher, Facundo Ballester, Luc Beaulieu, Hali Morrison, Audran Poher, Mark J. Rivard, Ron S. Sloboda, J. Vijande, Rowan M. Thomson

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Physics · 2024
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOcular Oncology and Treatments
Canadian institutionsCentre hospitalier universitaire de QuébecFoothills Medical CentreUniversity of AlbertaUniversité LavalUniversity of CalgaryCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBrachytherapyMedical physicsComputer scienceNuclear medicineMedicineRadiologyRadiation therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OpenAlex records an abstract for this work, but it could not be fetched just now.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.057
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.215
Threshold uncertainty score0.719

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.057
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0070.006
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0050.006
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2150.101

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.404
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical PhysicsSame topicOcular Oncology and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207