MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4400285982 · doi:10.1121/10.0027446

Direct sound printing: Way of manipulating ultrasonic chemistry to print directly engineering structures and remotely inside body

2024· article· en· W4400285982 on OpenAlexaff
Shervin Foroughi, Mohsen Habibi, Muthukumaran Packirisamy

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInnovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSound (geography)AcousticsUltrasonic sensor3D printingComputer graphics (images)Computer scienceMechanical engineeringNanotechnologyEngineering drawingMaterials scienceEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Direct sound printing (DSP) is a new class of additive manufacturing processes developed in our lab, in which chemical reactions during the 3D printing process are driven by sonochemical route using cavitation bubbles induced by focused ultrasound waves. This invited paper will present methods and possibilities of printing engineering structures with DSP. In addition, this talk will cover a new area called remote distance printing (RDP) and consequent applications. RDP is a new realm introduced by DSP method in which the printing location is not accessible by common energy sources like light or heat. In this situation, ultrasound could penetrate optically opaque materials and conduct printing without direct access to the printing location. This concept opens a wide variety of applications in engineering or medical fields. The focus of this paper is the application of DSP-RDP in biomedical application to print objects inside body without open surgery in a non-invasive manner. Ultrasound penetrates skin and tissues in DSP and is focused on the printing location inside body where the printing material is injected. This work explains DSP in detail and the interaction of the sound with the printing material and how the material is transformed from liquid to solid. The process is demonstrated using a test study conducted using tissue phantoms and also real porcine tissue. This work opens new applications to 3D print with ultrasound where no other 3D printing approaches can achieve.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America→Same topicInnovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation→French-language works237,207→