MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400286071 · doi:10.1121/10.0026761

Commissioning of National Research Council Canada’s four room flanking facility

2024· article· en· W4400286071 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering Structural Analysis Methods
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProject commissioningFlanking maneuverResearch councilLibrary sciencePolitical scienceEngineeringPublic administrationPublishingComputer scienceLawGovernment (linguistics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The National Research Council Canada has built a new four room flanking facility to expand its capability to test flanking noise transmission across junctions of typical multi-dwelling units. The cast-in-place concrete structure is configured to construct two rooms on top of two rooms. This facility allows various configurations to measure flanking noise: one continuous or two discontinuous floors (or walls) and a common façade (side wall). With the overhead crane, it is possible to install heavy monolithic elements such as precast concrete and cross-laminated timber panels such that are used in mid and high-rise buildings. There are structural breaks between the rooms to reduce unwanted structural transmission and the addition of shielding panels makes this facility capable of measuring flanking of high performing junctions/assemblies. The facility has been designed to meet the requirements of ISO 10848 for both airborne and impact noise transmission. Facility design details and commissioning data will be presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.880
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it