Sound transmission loss of vertical building partitions designed to meet shear structural requirements
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vertical partitions often include structural building elements designed to meet shear requirements. Shear partitions are designed to resist lateral load due to wind or seismic activity and are required in many regions throughout North America. Nightingale et al. completed a 70-assembly series quantifying the effect of shear OSB on the sound transmission loss (STL) of both wood- and steel-framed single-stud assemblies in the National Research Council Canada (NRCC) research report NRCC-45018. This research study builds on the NRCC research with a test of over 200 wood and steel assembly partitions. This research study includes single-, staggered-, and double-stud framing as well as various forms of shear treatment such as OSB Plywood installed on one or both sides of the partition, attachment with various nail attachment patterns, and steel strapping. The effect of these partition elements on the STL will be presented and discussed. Additionally, the effect of sound isolation treatment, such as additional mass, resilient channels, resilient sound isolation clips, and constrained-layer damping will be presented and discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".