MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A musical instrument as an implementation of artistic gesture: Cello

2024· article· en· W4400286539 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Larisa Hontova

Bibliographic record

VenueArt and education · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicChildren's Physical and Motor Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCelloMusical instrumentMusicalGestureArtVisual artsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceArt historyPianoAcousticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The series “The sound image of the instrument in the 20th century” article highlights the sound image of the cello as one of the wealthiest musical instruments in terms of its possibilities in the context of its interpretation as an artistic gesture - a mark aimed at the effect of a socio-cultural act of form and content. The outstanding role of suites for solo cello by I. S. Bach, who first revealed the instrument's possibilities and demonstrated its cantilene, virtuosic, and polyphonic capabilities, is pointed out. An example of a bright socio-cultural gesture is the creation of the Musical Garden in Canada, parts of which are associated with Bach’s cello suites. Examples of an individual approach to the sound of the cello and the creation of a particular extraordinary soundscape in the works of composers of the 20th century, M. Skoryk, J. Kram, M. Feldman, and H. Lachenman, are given. As an example of an original interpretation of the cello, the Cello Concerto No. 1 by Myroslav Skoryk is indicated, in which the cello is interpreted as the voice of a lyrical hero, and its dialogue with the orchestra is very diverse, which creates an exciting intrigue of the musical action. Gyorgy Ligeti can be considered a master of gesture: after graduating from the F. Liszt Academy of Music in Budapest, the author created the piece Dialogo for solo cello. In 1953, the composer made the second part of this work for the cellist Vera Denesh, which led to the design of the sonata for the cello. Ligety claimed that this is a dialogue between a woman and a man. In work "Cello and Orchestra (1972) by Morton Feldman, the author gives the cello overexpression against the background of the loud sound of the orchestra, which is on the border with alarming noise and declares complete submission to the sound of his own ideas. Helmut Lachenmann interprets the instruments as “geographical” objects: yes, the strings have “poles”, the role of which is played by the stand and pegs, the strings are given the role of "meridians", and the bow is a “parallel”. It is indicated that the cello, like the entire body of musical instruments, received so-called “advanced techniques” that enriched its sound and became the basis for performing various roles in solo and ensemble performances. The article presents the images of the cello in other forms of art, which proves the concrete-historical context of its perception and poetization in the art of different eras.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.015
Scholarly communication0.0090.003
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArt and educationSame topicChildren's Physical and Motor DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207