MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4400287705 · doi:10.5194/epsc2024-1261

The Metis contribution in cometary science: an initial assessment of the first four years of activities

2024· preprint· en· W4400287705 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alain Jody Corso, Vania Da Deppo, S. Giordano, Giuseppe Nisticó, Ivano Bertini, А. Бемпорад, Paolo Chioetto, M. Romoli

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstro and Planetary Science
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetisPsychologyGeographyComputer scienceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Throughout the initial four years of the operative mission, METIS coronagraph [1] carried out numerous scientific observations, including some focused-on comets. Among the observed cometary targets, there are periodic comets, like 2P/Encke, sunskirters, such as 96P/Machholz (see Figure 1), some sungrazers [2] and even a long period comet, the C/2021 A1 (Leonard) [3], having an orbital period of approximately 80,000 years. Although many of these observations, especially of periodic comets, were specifically planned, some comets were also identified a posteriori on images collected for solar corona studies.Figure 1: UV channel observation for the 96P/Machholz sunskirter comet during its transit in the METIS Field of View on January 30, 2023.Metis is the coronagraph onboard SolO and it has been conceived to acquire images of the solar corona both in linearly polarized visible light (VL, 580–640 nm) and narrow-band (±10 nm) ultraviolet (UV) around the HI Lyman-a (121.6 nm) spectral line. Metis is the first coronagraph able to perform such simultaneous observations.The instrument is designed to image the structure and dynamics of the full solar corona in an annular FoV covering the range from 1.6° to 2.9°, with a plate scale up to 10 “/px in VL channel and up to 20”/px in UV. Owing to the eccentricity of the spacecraft orbit, the heliocentric distances imaged are from 1.6 to 3.1 solar radii at minimum perihelion distance (0.28 au), up to the range from 6.0 to 12.0 solar radii when the spacecraft is around 1.0 au. A sketch of the raytrace of the two channels of the Metis coronagraph, i.e. the UV and VL, is given in Figure 2.Figure 2: Metis layout. On the top: the UV path. On the bottom: the VL path [4]. The ability of METIS to perform simultaneous imaging in a narrow UV band around HI Ly-alpha and in the visible wavelength range can be highly impactful in cometary studies. UV images enable the study of neutral hydrogen coma morphology and the estimation of the water outgassing rate from the comet nucleus. Conversely, visible polarization images allow the derivation of comet parameters correlated with the physical properties (distribution, density, size, ...) of the dust grains in the coma.In this work, a summary of the activities and main results obtained so far is presented, highlighting some original results obtained from METIS comet observations and sharing some valuable “lessons learned" from these four years of activity. AcknowledgementsSolar Orbiter is a space mission of international collaboration between ESA and NASA, operated by ESA. Metis was built and operated with funding from the Italian Space Agency (ASI), under contracts to the National Institute of Astrophysics (INAF) and industrial partners. Metis was built with hardware contributions from Germany (Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie through DLR), from the Czech Republic (PRODEX) and from ESA. References[1] Antonucci et al, A&A 642, A10 (2020).[2] Bemporad et al, A&A 680, A90 (2023).[3] Corso et al, EPSC2022-901 (2022)[4] Fineschi, S. et al., Exp. Astron. 49, 239-263 (2020).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAstro and Planetary Science→French-language works237,207→