Speech detection models for effective communicable disease risk assessment in air travel environments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In environments characterized by elevated noise levels, such as airports or aircraft cabins, travelers often find themselves involuntarily speaking loudly and drawing closer to one another in an effort to enhance communication and speech intelligibility. Unfortunately, this unintentional behaviour increases the risk of respiratory particles dispersion, potentially carrying infectious agents like bacteria which makes the contagion control more challenging. The accurate characterization of the risk associated to speaking, in such a challenging noise environment with multiple overlapping speech sources, is therefore of outmost importance. Among the most advanced signal processing strategies that can be used to accurately determine who spoke when and with whom and for how long but most importantly how loudly, at one location, artificial intelligence-based speaker diarization approaches were considered and adapted for this task. This article details the implementation of speaker diarization algorithms, customized to extract speaker and speech parameters discreetly. Validation and preliminary study results are also provided. The algorithms calculate speech duration and sound pressure level for each sentence and speaker, aiding in assessing viral contaminant spread. The paper focuses on applying these algorithms in noisy environments, particularly in confined spaces with multiple speakers. The findings contribute to proactive measures for containing and managing communicable diseases in air travel settings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".