MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400288167 · doi:10.5194/epsc2024-1125

HCl Variability in the Martian Atmosphere observed with ExoMars-TGO/NOMAD during 6 years of Solar Occultations

2024· preprint· en· W4400288167 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Adrián Brines, M. Á. López‐Valverde, Aurélien Stolzenbach, Ashimananda Modak, B. Funke, Francisco González‐Galindo, Angel Belmonte-Gimenez, Rosario Sanz-Mesa, Shohei Aoki, Ann Carine Vandaele, Frank Daerden, Ian Thomas, Justin Erwin, Loïc Trompet, Bojan Ristic, Gerónimo Villanueva, Giuliano Liuzzi, Manis Patel, G. Bellucci

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPlanetary Science and Exploration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAstrobiologyMartianAtmosphere (unit)Atmosphere of MarsAstronomySolar variationMars Exploration ProgramGeologyEnvironmental scienceAtmospheric sciencesPhysicsMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

NOMAD [1] (Nadir and Occultation for MArs Discovery) is a multi-channel spectrometer onboard the ExoMars 2016 Trace Gas Orbiter (TGO), which began its observations in April 2018. Among other two (LNO and UVIS), the Solar Occultation (SO) channel covers the infrared (IR) spectrum from 2.3 to 4.3 µm (2320 to 4350 cm-1). Composed of an echelle grating in Litrow configuration, a total of 6 diffraction orders (with a typical width from 20 to 35 cm-1) are selected during each solar occultation using an Acousto-Optical Tunable Filter (AOTF) with a sample rate of about ~1 s, allowing a vertical resolution of typically 1 km. The high spectral resolution (λ/∆λ ~17000) and the relatively low signal to noise ratio of this instrument (~2500) make NOMAD SO suitable for the detection of hydrogen chloride HCl. This trace species, although until now considered to be a negligible compound in the Martian atmosphere [2, 3], it has been detected systematically by two instruments onboard TGO: the Atmospheric Chemistry Suite (ACS) [4] and more recently NOMAD [5]. Several works suggest the surface of Mars to be a source of chloride minerals and perchlorate salts [6], which along with interactions surface-atmosphere could allow for chlorine photochemistry happening on the martian atmosphere. On Earth, one of the main sources of HCl is the volcanic activity [7], so the detection of this species on Mars may be an indicator of active geological processes. Multiple ongoing studies are trying to characterize the climatology of HCl on Mars, currently not completely understood, looking for possible relationships between temperature and other atmospheric species such as dust or water vapor.At the IAA we have carried out a study with the objective of identifying not only sources but seasonal variability of HCl by analyzing NOMAD spectra. This early study [8] using a simplified processing pipeline allowed us to detect HCl during the perihelion season of MYs 34 and 35, confirming previous results from [5]. Here, as a follow-up work of that study, we applied a modified version of our IAA-CSIC NOMAD processing pipeline [9-12] in order to increase the sensitivity required for the detection of weak HCl absorption lines, we have analyzed a total of 2536 solar occultations measured during Martian Years 34, 35 and 36. Among those modifications, we improved the methodology used for the characterization of the spectral continuum, now being able to detect systematic oscillations with amplitudes similar to the measurement noise (10-4 in transmittance). We have performed retrievals using NOMAD spectra from diffraction orders 129 (2899 - 2922 cm-1) and 130 (2921 - 2945 cm-1). In order to obtain robust HCl detections, we used the spectra from three detector bins on each ocucltation, retrieving an independent vertical profile form each bin. We present HCl vertical profiles and the seasonal variability of this species from a climatological view, revealing possible links with water vapor and dust.AcknowledgmentsThe IAA/CSIC team acknowledges financial support from the Severo Ochoa grant CEX2021-001131-S and by grants PID2022-137579NB-I00, RTI2018-100920-J-I00 and PID2022-141216NB-I00 all funded by MCIN/AEI/ 10.13039/501100011033. A. Brines acknowledges financial support from the grant PRE2019-088355 funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by ’ESF Investing in your future’. ExoMars is a space mission of the European Space Agency (ESA) and Roscosmos. The NOMAD experiment is led by the Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy (IASB-BIRA), assisted by Co-PI teams from Spain (IAA-CSIC), Italy (INAF-IAPS), and the United Kingdom (Open University). This project acknowledges funding by the Belgian Science Policy Office (BELSPO), with the financial and contractual coordination by the ESA Prodex Office (PEA 4000103401, 4000121493), by Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (MCIU) and by European funds under grants PGC2018-101836-B-I00 and ESP2017-87143-R (MINECO/FEDER), as well as by UK Space Agency through grants ST/V002295/1, ST/V005332/1, ST/Y000234/1 and ST/X006549/1 and Italian Space Agency through grant 2018-2-HH.0. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No 101004052. US investigators were supported by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Canadian investigators were supported by the Canadian Space Agency. We want to thank M. Vals, F. Montmessin, F. Lefevre, F. Forget and the broad LMD/IPSL team supporting the continuous development of the Mars PCM. References1. Vandaele, A. C. (2018). Space Science Reviews, 214, 1-47.2. Hartogh, P. (2010). Astronomy & Astrophysics, 521, L49.3. Villanueva, G. L. (2013). Icarus, 223(1), 11-27.4. Korablev, O. (2021) . Science Advances 7, eabe4386.5. Aoki, S. (2021). Geophysical Research Letters 48, e2021GL092506.6. Glavin, D. P. (2013). Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets 118, 1955–1973.7. Graedel, T. (1995) . Global Biogeochemical Cycles 9, 47–77.8. Belmote-Gimenez, A. (2023) Mater Thesis, University of Granada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPlanetary Science and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207