MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400288444 · doi:10.1121/10.0027140

Tony Embleton—Distinguished researcher, successful manager, consummate acoustician

2024· article· en· W4400288444 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bennett M. Brooks

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies in Central America
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsManagementPsychologyBusinessSociologyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tony F. W. Embleton was a distinguished researcher in acoustics. His early career focused on practical noise control projects and experimental non-linear acoustics. Later, Tony made important contributions to the understanding of sound propagation outdoors. Tony spent much of his career at the National Research Council of Canada (NRCC). His professional homes were the ASA and the CAA. Tony received numerous awards from the ASA for his work, including the R. Bruce Lindsay Award in 1964, the ASA Silver Medal in Noise in 1986, and the ASA Gold Medal in 2002 “For fundamental contributions to understanding outdoor sound propagation and noise control and for leadership in the Society.” Tony recognized the value of professional organizations and served the ASA as Vice-President (1977–78) and President (1980–81). He also understood the importance of practical applications in acoustics serving as ASA Standards Director (1993–97), navigating the organization through a tough period, and growing the program toward a solid future. Most importantly, Tony was known for his kind and generous spirit, and his outreach and inspiration to newer colleagues. Many of us are the grateful beneficiaries of his gentle enthusiasm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.168

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0500.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaSame topicHistorical Studies in Central AmericaFrench-language works237,207