MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400288743 · doi:10.1121/10.0027084

Separate emission/reception transducers for 3D ultrafast ultrasound imaging

2024· article· en· W4400288743 on OpenAlexaff
Alexis Carrion, Ibrahima Touré, Tamara Krpic, Maxime Bilodeau, Patrice Masson, Nicolas Quaegebeur

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransducerUltrashort pulseUltrasoundUltrasound imagingAcousticsComputer scienceMaterials scienceOpticsPhysicsLaser

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent advancements in ultrafast 3D ultrasound imaging have revolutionized the field of echography, enabling its extension to novel applications such as cerebral dynamics, cardiac electrophysiology and the quantitative imaging of intrinsic mechanical properties of tumors. To facilitate these advancements, two primary transducer strategies are employed in 3D imaging. The first involves dense 2D probes equipped with a large number of elements, typically exceeding 1024. The second strategy uses row-column addressing, which simplifies the electronic control of the probe elements. Despite their effectiveness, these methods entail complexities in design and fabrication. Addressing these challenges, our study introduces an innovative transducer configuration that distinctly separates emission and reception functionalities. This separation not only simplifies the overall transducer design but also significantly reduces the system's complexity. A sparse array of PVDF transducers, which have been laser micro-machined to ensure acoustic transparency, is used at the reception. For the emission aspect, we employ a specialized acoustic concentrator to emulate point-like emission. The paper presents the detailed design requirements, assembly process, and the operational principles of this novel transducer. Furthermore, an experimental validation is conducted using a CIRS 040GSE phantom model. This validation is crucial to demonstrate the practical applicability and reliability of our transducer in real-world medical imaging scenarios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaSame topicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic ImagingFrench-language works237,207