Multiplexed immunolabelling of cancer using bioconjugated plasmonic gold–silver alloy nanoparticles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reliable protein detection methods are vital for advancing biological research and medical diagnostics. While immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence are commonly employed, their limitations underscore the necessity for alternative approaches. This study introduces immunoplasmonic labelling, utilizing plasmonic nanoparticles (NPs), specifically designed gold and gold-silver alloy NPs (Au:Ag NPs), for multiplexed and quantitative protein detection. These NPs, when coupled with antibodies targeting proteins of interest, enable accurate counting and evaluation of protein expression levels while overcoming issues such as autofluorescence. In this study, we compare two nanoparticle functionalization strategies-one coating based on thiolated PEG and one coating based on calix[4]arenes-on gold and gold-silver alloy nanoparticles of varying sizes. Overall results tend to demonstrate a greater versatility for the calix[4]arene-based coating. With this coating and using the classical EDC/sulfo-NHS cross-linking procedure, we also demonstrate the successful multiplexed immunolabelling of Her2, CD44, and EpCAM in breast cancer cell lines (SK-BR-3 and MDA-MB-231). Furthermore, we introduce a user-friendly software for automatic NP detection and classification by colour, providing a promising proof-of-concept for the practical application of immunoplasmonic techniques in the quantitative analysis of biopsies in the clinical setting.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".