Quantitative susceptibility mapping in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: automatic quantification of the magnetic susceptibility in the subcortical nuclei
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective Previous studies have suggested a link between dysregulation of cortical iron levels and neuronal loss in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients. However, few studies have reported differences in quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) values in subcortical nuclei between patients with ALS and healthy controls (HCs).Methods MRI was performed using a 3 Tesla Prisma scanner (64-channel head coil), including 3D T1-MPRAGE and multi-echo 3D GRE for QSM reconstruction. Automated QSM segmentation was used to measure susceptibility values in the subcortical nuclei, which were compared between the groups. Correlations with clinical scales were analyzed. Group comparisons were performed using independent t-tests, with p < 0.05 considered significant. Correlations were assessed using Pearson’s correlation, with p < 0.05 considered significant. Cohen’s d was reported to compare the standardized mean difference (SMD) of QSM.Results Twelve patients with limb-onset ALS (mean age 48.7 years, 75% male) and 13 age-, sex-, and handedness-matched HCs (mean age 44.6 years, 69% male) were included. Compared to HCs, ALS patients demonstrated significantly lower susceptibility in the left caudate nucleus (CN) (SMD = −0.845), right CN (SMD = −0.851), whole CN (SMD = −1.016), and left subthalamic nucleus (STN) (SMD = −1.000). Susceptibility in the left putamen (SMD = −0.857), left thalamus (SMD = −1.081), and whole thalamus (SMD = −0.968) was significantly higher in the patients. The susceptibility of the substantia nigra (SN), CN, and pulvinar was positively correlated with disease duration.Conclusions QSM detects abnormal iron accumulation patterns in the subcortical gray matter of ALS patients, which correlates with disease characteristics, supporting its potential as a neuroimaging biomarker.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".