MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400306945 · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-49940-4

Magnetic excitations in strained infinite-layer nickelate PrNiO2 films

2024· article· en· W4400306945 on OpenAlexafffund
Qiang Gao, Shiyu Fan, Qisi Wang, Jiarui Li, X.M. Ren, I. Biało, Annabella Drewanowski, Pascal Rothenbühler, Jaewon Choi, Ronny Sutarto, Yao Wang, Tao Xiang, Jiangping Hu, Ke‐Jin Zhou, Valentina Bisogni, Riccardo Comin, J. Chang, Jonathan Pelliciari, Xingjiang Zhou, Zhihai Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Communications · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Canadian institutionsCanadian Light Source (Canada)
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaBrookhaven National LaboratoryNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchOffice of ScienceChinese Academy of SciencesNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaU.S. Department of EnergySchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungCanadian Light SourceNational Science Foundation
KeywordsSuperconductivityCondensed matter physicsStrain (injury)Layer (electronics)DopingScatteringMaterials sciencePhysicsNanotechnologyOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Strongly correlated materials respond sensitively to external perturbations such as strain, pressure, and doping. In the recently discovered superconducting infinite-layer nickelates, the superconducting transition temperature can be enhanced via only ~ 1% compressive strain-tuning with the root of such enhancement still being elusive. Using resonant inelastic x-ray scattering (RIXS), we investigate the magnetic excitations in infinite-layer PrNiO 2 thin films grown on two different substrates, namely SrTiO 3 (STO) and (LaAlO 3 ) 0.3 (Sr 2 TaAlO 6 ) 0.7 (LSAT) enforcing different strain on the nickelates films. The magnon bandwidth of PrNiO 2 shows only marginal response to strain-tuning, in sharp contrast to the enhancement of the superconducting transition temperature T c in the doped superconducting samples. These results suggest the bandwidth of spin excitations of the parent compounds is similar under strain while T c in the doped ones is not, and thus provide important empirics for the understanding of superconductivity in infinite-layer nickelates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.659
Threshold uncertainty score0.739

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature CommunicationsSame topicPhysics of Superconductivity and MagnetismFrench-language works237,207