Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nonreciprocal vibration transmission is an important problem from a fundamental perspective and because of the additional functionalities that it enables in mechanical or acoustic devices. A common realization of nonreciprocal dynamics relies on implementation of nonlinear internal forces within the system. In this talk, we identify and discuss different manifestations of nonreciprocity in nonlinear systems. As a necessary condition, nonreciprocal dynamics is realized in nonlinear systems with broken mirror symmetry. We show that a second symmetry-breaking parameter can counteract the original asymmetry and ultimately restore reciprocal dynamics in a system with broken mirror symmetry, even near the system resonances. Thus, breaking the mirror symmetry is a necessary but insufficient condition for realizing nonreciprocity in nonlinear systems. We also highlight the contribution of phase to nonreciprocal vibration transmission by discussing response regimes that are characterized by nonreciprocal phase shifts. Our findings showcase the potential of asymmetry to serve as an additional design parameter for devices that operate based on nonreciprocity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it