Big Data with Cloud Computing Model for Customer Need Identification in E-Commerce Industry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, we investigate how Big Data and Cloud computing can work together to better understand what online shoppers really want. The proliferation of e-commerce has increased the importance of listening to and meeting the requirements of customers. This research utilizes a wide variety of data sources to perform descriptive and predictive analysis, including customer transaction records, website clickstream data, customer reviews, and social media interactions. The prediction model's impressive prognostic accuracy may be attributed to its incorporation of client demographics, historical purchase history, and sentiment analysis. Text mining and natural language processing (NLP) are proven to provide insights from consumer input, while cloud computing architecture is shown to increase operational efficiency and scalability. In this paper, we explore how E-commerce enterprises may benefit from this game-changing technology by improving their customer service, cutting costs, and gaining an edge in the market. Business leaders, data scientists, cloud providers, academics, and the public all stand to gain from this study's findings. Future research directions that hold promise for keeping the E-commerce landscape at the cutting edge of innovation and customer-centric strategies include advanced deep learning techniques; real-time customer need identification; data privacy; scalability; cross-channel analysis; and industry benchmarking.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".