Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet ouvrage porte sur les interrelations entre les mouvements sociaux, les mouvements des minorités et des groupes minorisés, le mouvement pour les droits humains et les conceptualisations récentes de l’anthropologie et des sciences sociales sur ces questions. Il se présente comme un état des lieux des avancées des larges mouvements sociaux et des mobilisations de divers groupes au Québec et ailleurs dans le monde sur le plan des droits. Les droits humains sont abordés en tant que pratiques sociales plurielles, discours, actions symboliques et performatives. Cet ouvrage permet également d'aborder à travers une série de cas spécifiques, la manière dont, d'une part, les mouvements ont agi dans le champ des droits, sur les plans subjectif, stratégique, politique et la manière dont, d'autre part, les scientifiques des sciences sociales, notamment les anthropologues, ont finalement pris acte de ces formes d'action et les ont traduites à leur façon.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".