MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400344706 · doi:10.1101/2024.07.02.600389

Fructose consumption in pregnancy and associations with maternal and offspring hepatic and whole-body adiposity: a scoping review

2024· preprint· en· W4400344706 on OpenAlexaff
Grace Zhao, Sarah Chondon, Clint Gray, Sheridan Gentili, Meagan Stanley, Timothy R.H. Regnault

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiet, Metabolism, and Disease
Canadian institutionsChildren’s Health Research InstituteWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOffspringPregnancyFructoseMedicineObstetricsPhysiologyConsumption (sociology)EndocrinologyInternal medicineBiologyFood science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Background Fructose is a major component in the Western diet, and its increased intake has been linked to adverse metabolic health, including impaired hepatic function and increased adiposity. The early life period, including preconceptionally, pregnancy and the newborn period, are critical periods in determining later metabolic health. However, the impact of excess fructose intake during this time on maternal, fetal, and offspring hepatic and whole-body adiposity, are ill defined. Objectives To understand the effects of maternal fructose consumption pre- and during pregnancy on maternal, fetal and offspring hepatic and whole-body adiposity. Methods A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL was performed up to August 23, 2022, to identify studies that focused on maternal fructose consumption pre- and during pregnancy on hepatic and whole-body adiposity in the mother, fetus, and offspring. Citations, abstracts, and full texts were screened in duplicate. Hepatic adiposity was defined as elevated hepatic triglycerides or overall hepatic fat accumulation. Whole-body adiposity was defined as increased adipose tissue or adipocyte hypertrophy. Results After screening 2334 citations, 33 experimental studies reporting maternal fructose consumption pre- and during pregnancy in rodents were included. Prenatal fructose exposure was associated with maternal (9 out of 12) and offspring (6 out of 10) whole-body adiposity. A high proportion of studies (13 out of 14) supported the association between fructose during pregnancy and increased maternal hepatic adiposity. Fetal hepatic adiposity and elevated expression of hepatic lipogenic proteins were noted in four studies. Offspring hepatic adiposity was supported in 14 of the 17 articles that discussed hepatic results, with five studies demonstrating more severe effects in female offspring. Conclusions Fructose consumption during pregnancy in rodent models is associated with maternal, fetal, and offspring hepatic, whole-body adiposity and underlying sex-specific effects. There are no human fructose studies and its effects in the early life period. Registration number H8F26 on Open Science Framework

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.004
Bibliometrics0.0120.014
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicDiet, Metabolism, and DiseaseFrench-language works237,207