Is depression a global brain disorder with topographic dynamic reorganization?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is characterized by a multitude of psychopathological symptoms including affective, cognitive, perceptual, sensorimotor, and social. The neuronal mechanisms underlying such co-occurrence of psychopathological symptoms remain yet unclear. Rather than linking and localizing single psychopathological symptoms to specific regions or networks, this perspective proposes a more global and dynamic topographic approach. We first review recent findings on global brain activity changes during both rest and task states in MDD showing topographic reorganization with a shift from unimodal to transmodal regions. Next, we single out two candidate mechanisms that may underlie and mediate such abnormal uni-/transmodal topography, namely dynamic shifts from shorter to longer timescales and abnormalities in the excitation-inhibition balance. Finally, we show how such topographic shift from unimodal to transmodal regions relates to the various psychopathological symptoms in MDD including their co-occurrence. This amounts to what we describe as 'Topographic dynamic reorganization' which extends our earlier 'Resting state hypothesis of depression' and complements other models of MDD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".