MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400350037 · doi:10.3390/jcm13133955

Specific Oral Manifestations in Adults with Crohn’s Disease

2024· article· en· W4400350037 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Medicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGlossitisDiseaseCrohn's diseaseRetrospective cohort studyStomatitisMucositisSingle CenterDemographicsGastroenterologyInternal medicineDermatologySurgeryTonguePathologyChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Oral manifestations of Crohn’s disease (CD) include non-specific lesions and specific lesions directly related to intestinal inflammation. Oral lesions that can be overlooked in CD are sometimes challenging to treat. Methods: In this retrospective single-center study, patients with CD aged over 18 years who complied with follow-up and treatment were included. Clinical definitions of specific oral lesions included pyostomatitis vegetans, glossitis with fissuring, lip swelling with fissuring, cobblestoning, and orofacial granulomatosis. Experienced dentists confirmed the specific lesions in each case. Three groups of patients were identified: those without oral lesions, those with non-specific oral lesions, and those with specific oral lesions. The groups were compared based on demographics, disease extent and behavior (based on the Montreal classification), extraintestinal involvement, biologic and steroid treatment, and the requirement of resective surgery. Results: A total of 96 patients (14.2%) with oral lesions were found among the 676 patients with CD (59.7% male, median age 38 years) who were followed for 6.83 years (IQR 0.5–29.87 years). Eight patients (1.2%, 9 lesions) had specific oral lesions, while eighty-eight patients (13%) had non-specific lesions. Orofacial granulomatosis (n = 3), cobblestoning (n = 2), glossitis with fissuring (n = 2), and lip swelling with fissuring (n = 2) were among the specific lesions. The majority of patients (75%) with specific lesions were male, and their median age was 46.5 years (range: 23–68 years). Disease localization was commonly ileocolonic (50%), and perianal disease was present in 25% of patients. Three patients were active smokers. Extraintestinal manifestations were peripheral arthritis/arthralgia (n = 7) and sacroiliitis (n = 1). All specific lesions were associated with moderate-to-severe disease. Five patients improved with biologic therapy, and two patients with immunomodulatory therapy. Conclusions: Specific oral lesions in CD were associated with active disease and improved with immunomodulators or biologic therapy. Close cooperation between gastroenterologists and dentists is essential for early diagnosis and optimal management of CD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.370
Threshold uncertainty score0.742

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.395
Teacher spread0.348 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it