MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400351852 · doi:10.3390/su16135760

Optimal Control Policy of Unreliable Production Systems Generating Greenhouse Gas Emission

2024· article· en· W4400351852 on OpenAlexafffund
Jean‐Pierre Kenné, Ali Gharbi, Armel Leonel Kuegoua Takengny, M. Assid

Bibliographic record

VenueSustainability · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicSustainable Supply Chain Management
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie SupérieureUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGreenhouse gasContext (archaeology)Production (economics)Optimal controlStochastic controlControl (management)Operations researchComputer scienceInventory controlMathematical optimizationSensitivity (control systems)Product (mathematics)Production controlProduction planningEnvironmental economicsEngineeringEconomicsMathematicsMicroeconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The current paper addresses the production planning problem of unreliable manufacturing systems generating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, producing a single product type in a dynamic and stochastic context. This work aims to develop a control policy that minimizes the sum of backlog, inventory, and emission costs. To achieve this goal, the stochastic optimal control theory is used to develop the optimality conditions solved by numerical techniques to establish the control policy structure. Sensitivity analyses are provided to depict and validate the obtained structure of the production policy characterized by multiple thresholds, which regulate the production rate with the emission and inventory levels. Furthermore, the performance of the developed optimal control policy is compared with the most pertinent ones identified in the literature. The developed optimal control policy outperformed those in the literature by significantly reducing the total cost incurred by these policies. Finally, the developed control policy is implemented to equip the manager of the considered manufacturing system with a practical and robust decision-support tool.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSustainabilitySame topicSustainable Supply Chain ManagementFrench-language works237,207