MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400353351 · doi:10.7759/cureus.63909

The Alveolar Variant of Lobular Carcinoma and Its Mimickers: A Case Series

2024· article· en· W4400353351 on OpenAlexaff
Habibat F Kolawole, Harpreet Rai, Peter Lovrics, Pooja Vasudev

Bibliographic record

VenueCureus · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBreast Lesions and Carcinomas
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityUniversity of TorontoMcMaster University Medical CentreSt. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBreast cancerNot Otherwise SpecifiedPathologyMastectomyBiopsyLobular carcinomaLesionDuctal carcinomaCancerInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is the most common special type of invasive breast cancer (IBC), accounting for 5-15% of IBCs. The distinct histomorphology of ILC reflects a special tumor biology, the hallmark of which is the lack of E-cadherin expression. However, the occasional presence of E-cadherin expression and the presence of IBC of no special type (IBC, NST)-like morphologies in ILC and vice versa make the diagnosis challenging. We present two cases of the alveolar variant of ILC, a diagnostically challenging entity. The first case is an 81-year-old female with two discrete right breast masses at 1 o'clock and 9 o'clock positions. The second case is a 61-year-old female with two discrete left breast masses located at 11 o'clock and 12 o'clock positions. Core needle biopsies and subsequent mastectomy were performed in both cases. On histology, three tumor foci were identified in the first case. The 1 o'clock focus showed IBC, NST, grade 3/3, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS). The 9 o'clock focus revealed ILC, classic and alveolar variants, grade 2/3, while a nearby third incidental focus was ILC, alveolar variant, both supported by lack of E-cadherin and β-catenin immunostaining. The second case showed ILC, alveolar variant, grade 1 with LCIS component in the 11 o'clock lesion on both biopsy and mastectomy specimens. The lesion at the 12 o'clock position was diagnosed as IBC, NST, grade 2 with high-grade DCIS and LCIS components. It is challenging to distinguish the alveolar variant of ILC from IBC, NST, and in situ lesions because of the overlapping morphology and occasional E-cadherin expression. Altered adherence of lobular cells may also be due to loss of α-, β-, and γ-catenins, and cytoplasmic re-localization of p120-catenin. Therefore, in ILC, the lack of β-catenin can be used as an adjunct along with E-cadherin. Myoepithelial markers such as p63 and smooth muscle myosin heavy chain (SMMHC) can be used to distinguish the alveolar variant of ILC from LCIS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.303
Threshold uncertainty score0.229

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCureusSame topicBreast Lesions and CarcinomasFrench-language works237,207