MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400354464 · doi:10.1080/19424280.2024.2369985

The influence of longitudinal bending stiffness on running economy and biomechanics in male and female runners

2024· article· en· W4400354464 on OpenAlexaff
Gabriella Durante, Christian A. Clermont, Zachary B. Barrons, Claudiane Arakaki Fukuchi, Darren J. Stefanyshyn, John W. Wannop

Bibliographic record

VenueFootwear Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSports Performance and Training
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiomechanicsRunning economyStiffnessBending stiffnessSports biomechanicsBendingStructural engineeringPhysical medicine and rehabilitationEngineeringOrthodonticsMedicineAnatomySimulationInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of different longitudinal bending stiffnesses (LBS) on running economy and lower extremity joint biomechanics in male and female runners. Thirty participants (15 F;15M) performed a treadmill protocol of five-minute randomised aerobic runs with four different footwear conditions varying in LBS: 16.1 N/mm; 32.7 N/mm; 46.1 N/mm; 90.1 N/mm. Biomechanical data was collected at the metatarsophalangeal (MTP) and ankle joints. Running economy was quantified via oxygen consumption data. Oxygen consumption observed no significant differences between footwear conditions (p = 0.960) or significant interaction between footwear and sex (p = 0.126). Stance time observed a significant difference between footwear conditions (p < 0.001), and a significant interaction of footwear and sex (p = 0.008), increasing in females as stiffness increased. At the MTP joint, a shoe effect was present for peak bending angle (p < 0.001), peak extension (p = 0.040) and flexion (p < 0.001) angular velocity, and energy generated at the joint (p = 0.010). There was also an interaction effect of peak MTP extension angular velocity (p = 0.044), with females slightly decreasing as stiffness increased, with no reaction from males. At the ankle joint, a shoe effect was present for peak dorsiflexion (p < 0.001) and plantarflexion (p < 0.001) angular velocity, peak negative power (p < 0.001) and energy absorbed at the joint (p < 0.001). Comparing the interaction between shoe condition and male/female runners, male and female runners reacted similarly to the increased LBS with no effect on running economy and subtle changes in the stance time and MTP angular velocity for female runners. While further research is needed in this area investigating aspects related to sex-specific optimal stiffness element location and geometry, it does not appear that the stiffness magnitude has a sex dependence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFootwear ScienceSame topicSports Performance and TrainingFrench-language works237,207